9/11 is a very multi-layered propaganda operation. We need to bear in mind that propaganda was pushed out for every single hypothesis for how the buildings came down and no purported evidence can be taken at face value. For example, we should not accept that the image showing "[e]vidence of a severe high-temperature corrosion attack on the steel, including oxidation and sulfidation with subsequent intragranular melting" is genuine necessarily because we can see that the "toasted" cars pushing the DEWs hypothesis are obviously not genuine as their missing door handles and number plates indicate junkyard cars.
They pushed out propaganda for controlled demolition, DEWs, thermite/nanothermite and nukes - all methods have been propagandised to us. I believe there is a correct one, controlled demolition, but my hypothesis is not based on the evidence shown to us ... because ALL of it is fake.
Everything they showed us of 9/11 is FAKE - there may be genuine evidence included but essentially it is fake.
--- The witness, loved one, emergency responder and reporter testimonies are scripted - we can see, for example, that Brian Williams' question to David Restuccio, "Can you confirm it was No 7 that just went in?" is scripted because "to go in" is an industry term used because buildings fall in on themselves and Williams would never have used that term naturally because a. he would not be familiar with it, b. he would instinctively know not to incriminate the authorities in such a way. The reporters alluding to controlled demolition are all scripted and targeted to the anticipated disbelievers of the nonsense story - they didn't want journalists propagandising fire because then it would reveal they were in on it and they didn't want people to recognise that a significant number of media personnel were in on it - it wouldn't fit their "people left to die cold-bloodedly in the buildings" narrative pushed to the disbelievers when the death and injury were staged.
--- The plane crashes are fake
--- The images of the injured are of people participating in drills
--- The jumpers are CGI
--- The footage of the building destructions is fake (even though WTC-7's destruction looks far more like a controlled implosion than the twin towers' the footage of none of them is real - I think we can guess that there wouldn't have only been explosives laid at the base for WTC-7 - it was too tall a building - and in a real demolition we have to ask why the mechanical penthouse atop the building would crumple first instead of just coming down with the building as it came down)
--- The imagery of Ground Zero is fake
It's all fake
These are simple facts though:
--- No high rise steel frame building has ever been brought down by any method other than controlled demolition
--- We are told Controlled Demolition, Inc (CDI) presented their cleanup plan for the WTC eleven days after 9/11
--- CDI achieved three of their four world records in large building demolition projects in the three years before 9/11 - 1998 (2), 2000 (1).
Simon Shack of Clues Forum and others on his forum worked all this out back in 2009/2010.
It's amazing how the truth is out there ...
My hypothesis for the twin towers is that they didn't peel down as shown (not how CDs work) but were essentially tipped into the WTC which was completely evacuated. They wanted to destroy the WTC so why have buildings spitting out debris in every direction when they could aim them into a place that was targeted for destruction.
No planes, no demolitions, no ppl falling, etc. What do imagine the tens of thousands of people watching the events unfold live that morning saw? And where are they??
I know someone who was there who said he saw a plane heading to the South Tower. No idea what he saw ... however, the two salient points are:
--- the alleged airliners didn't crash so there were no deaths in airliners
--- what they showed us on TV of planes is clearly fake
For jumpers they could have had dummies on the day but what they show us is CGI mostly (perhaps sometimes dummies).
I'm not saying there were no demolitions - of course there were - what I'm saying is that what people might have seen on the day and what they show us is different. What Clues Forum say in relation to the demolitions is that they were obscured by military obscurants - the thing is as soon as a demolition starts masses of material spews out obscuring them pretty well - see Mina Plaza - so they wouldn't be that difficult to hide - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ceXT5PYTGI
You surely don't believe anyone died in a plane though, do you?
You dont answer the question. Everything “shown to us” (read what people saw) was not faked. How could it be? People (including me) watched it live. So, if it was all fake how do you account for what people saw when they were there?
Massive amounts of what they put forward as "live" was, in fact, pre-recorded and there are obvious examples of green-screening including the infamous Mark Walsh.
He may be a person. Someone told me that and when I see pasted walls and links where there should be a few sentences I tend to think that's what it is. Its also tends to respond quickly even tho it is not following my page or subbed to it. Trying to gauge how to tell if it's a bot or not is difficult. Spend some time with an LLM like https://poe.com/Claude-3.5-Sonnet - I asked it if bots can simulate hitting links:
"Yes, bots can both hit links and leave records of doing so. Here's what they typically do:
Yeah - that is a bit scary. Even just spending a bit of time with ChatGPT tells me even the bare minimum of what the official level of LLMs has become. The unofficial level, however, is bound to be much, much higher.
I often get very suspicious with 'ridiculously quick' responses etc. 9/11 revisionist is like that of course and it's always the same copy & paste stuff. As you say that doesn't necessarily indicate bot, but it definitely indicates continuous monitoring (keyword/phrase/article searches etc.). That could result in automated responses, for sure. It would, as it happens, be strange if the bad guys didn't have this kind of continuously running program going on. The old thing about 'if it didn't exist, it would be necessary for the bad guys to have invented it'. I do believe that the counterfactual or 'what if' approach is immensely valuable.
I've also encountered a fair few so-called 'trolls' who are like this, and often wondered if they are bots, despite their 'seeming' like real people. Which is what I mean about how far LLMs have come - it seems clear that specific 'personalities' can also be programmed.
This, obviously, also explains why I am hardly getting any translation work anymore...
Many bots just leave one little comment then never engage. Ad companies do that. It may very well be a person is the crazy part. I cant really say bc ppl act differently so online,, It's easy to be misled either way. Think of how 9/11 changed so many ppl's thinking about what is possible. Disinfo exploits that
That's an interesting little exchange you had, especially from a psychological perspective. He/it doesn't actually answer questions like a human being. In fact he doesn't answer questions at all, just throws stuff back. There's a lot of projection as well, like accusing you of being a 'copy & paste' person. Hello Mr. Pot, my name's Mr. Kettle.
I also noticed a few phrases he/it had said to me too a few times, like 'horse to water but can't make it drink'.
Anyhow, I guess the real question is something like 'is the failure to engage a sign of a bot, or just a closed-minded agitator type'.
Regardless, these types do a lot of damage. Half the time I choose to just ignore them. Actually most of the time these days!
You should really read this article and get your head unstuck from your arse - You've been duped by the neuro-linguistic selling techniques of Richard Gage and his architects for an engineered truth's COINTELPRO organisation.
See my above comment about the fact that if you were genuine you would express love and care and rage against the people who carry out these false flags and psyops. But you people never do.
You seriously, seriously need to tell your supervisor about that and rethink the way you post your fucking misdirectional bullshit.
Psychology blows the lot of you wide open. Fucking grow up. Amateurs.
Tell me how you feel about the people who carry out all these psyops. You never do. That's telling. You only attack other people who want to know the truth. Like, if they don't agree with you, you attack them.
A genuine 'truth seeker' would have a totally different psychological profile. So I seriously advise you, as a counter-subversion agent, to have an urgent meeting with your supervisor to redress this glaring psychological anomaly in your cognitive infiltration.
I'm fucking serious here, by the way. You and I know that your so called 'science' is ludicrous. You may succeed in 'recruiting' idiots, but more intelligent people like me, and Albert, and Francis, are totally beyond your capabilities. Which, naturally, explains why you expend so much energy on attacking us.
By now, you can't just shut us down because that's also a dead giveaway. So you need to think about a new strategy.
Maybe go back to your original objective and reassess the situation. Are you a fully-paid up member of the monstrous cabal who absolutely hates humanity, or are you just a corrupted human? Bribed or blackmailed, that is. Or given the proverbial 'offer you can't refuse' (which would mean you used to blog under a different name, of course).
Either way, you, and your supervisor, seriously need to have an urgent meeting to reconsider your strategy. Because the truth is, the more you go on, the more utterly ridiculous you look. Same goes for your 'theories'. You are, indeed, going to have to have this meeting at some point soon. It may have worked for a while, but it's run its course.
If you want my help and advice (given how much more intelligent I am than you lot) then I would be happy to provide it. I mean that offer sincerely, by the way. Obviously you have to save face so you won't answer in a comment here. But seriously, fucking talk to your supervisor. Because more intelligent people like me are just going to keep on provoking you into looking more, and more, rude, insulting, unattractive, and frankly stupid.
People don't like it gets pointed out that they've been fooled.
9/11 was an attack on human consciousness, a trauma based mind control event and most people like you that might even be financially invested in architects for an engineered truth, Steven E. Jones, Richard Gage and more's lies, due to their neuro-linguistic selling techniques have allowed their PTSD of 9/11 cloud their judgement.
Repeat a lie, repeat it often enough and later it will become truth...
Why do you think Gage does between 60 and 90 presentations a year?
Your unwillingness to even consider the information shared with you is proof that you are playing a premeditated ignorance game... It's really a sad state of affairs. But stay in your comfort zone. I know how difficult it is for people to really challenge long held beliefs...
Just goes to show, once again, you can bring a horse to water and cannot force it to drink.
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
What really gives you people away is your total lack of normal human emotional response. There's a term for that, it's called 'sociopath'.
The same is true for all the cognitive infiltrators. It's easy to recruit them precisely because they don't care. Give them a fair amount of money and boost the algorithm to give them dozens of likes and follows and so on and their narcissistic ego is satisfied.
You see, ultimately it doesn't matter a jot how 9-11 was carried out, whether there were or weren't any planes or whether the twins were brought down by controlled demolition or DEWs. What it led to was a war of terror impacting trauma on well over a billion people. That's hundreds of millions of children being subjected to continuous abuse, like the children of Gaza are suffering right now.
But you don't care. By contrast, if you read people like myself, or Albert, or Francis, or any other genuine person you will easily detect a normal and understandable emotional reaction, a mixture of anger and distress mainly. That's how you can tell they - we - are not subversive cognitive infiltrators.
This is the reason why I say you need to have a word with your supervisor (I notice you pointedly avoided addressing those points I made). Of course if you were to suddenly express anger and distress and suchlike that would be obvious, so you should do it gradually.
Your response, however, is typical of one with a weak internal ego/self-esteem/self-perception - when you are challenged you respond with aggression, rudeness and insults. That's a sign of a weakness in your position, of which you are perfectly self-aware. It hurts your narcissistic ego to be challenged.
And your ego is clearly more important to you than the implications of hundreds of millions of innocent people being abused and terrorised. This tells me, blatantly, everything I need to know about you.
As for my own parting shot, I will tell you something which will cut right through to the core of you, your fragile ego. It's your repetitive reflex response to do your copy & paste thing. Because the other possibly even more important thing about you is that, fundamentally, you are just BORING!
O, dear truly intellectually disingenuous article, just like Francis' ....
I'm not going delve into your full article and break it down bit by bit, because I see it as a waste of time, as I have danced with disingenuous people like you way too often and my articles cover people like you in depth, BUT I will suggest people look at the "truth suppressie timeline" article I wrote as it lays out exactly what happened right after the "9/11 scholars for truth" was formed in 2005 and how Dr Wood, Prof James Fetzer, Dr Steven E. Jones were "comparing notes" and what fallout there was....
Maybe you too need to go read it? It also covers Greg Jenkins...
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
It's 'disingenuous' only you cannot cite even one example of it. Not very compelling. I tried to engage you in a conversation without copy and pasting walls of text but you were unable to.
We can try again right here. Start with naming one thing I wrote that is disingenuous, and just have a normal chat with no pasting pls.
My article called “The Truth Suppression Timeline” has all the proof you need of the concerted effort to stifle people looking at the evidence Dr Wood presents and the complicity of Dr Steven E. Jones, Greg Jenkins, Richard Gage, David Chandler, architects for an engineered truth, Ted Walter and his “Center for 9/11 Justice”, suppression and all the poo-ba 9/11 “truther” movement organisations…
They are ALL truth-traitors.
If you cannot get over your own cognitive dissonance, and premeditated ignorance game you’re playing with yourself, then unfortunately there is no hope for you.
Thermite believers are like pro-vaxxers that got injured by the CV-19 injections and think the constant sickness, heart issues and turbo cancers are due to climate change.
People who will be lost forever…
I too once believed the thermite bullshit, then I started thinking for myself…
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
9/11 is a very multi-layered propaganda operation. We need to bear in mind that propaganda was pushed out for every single hypothesis for how the buildings came down and no purported evidence can be taken at face value. For example, we should not accept that the image showing "[e]vidence of a severe high-temperature corrosion attack on the steel, including oxidation and sulfidation with subsequent intragranular melting" is genuine necessarily because we can see that the "toasted" cars pushing the DEWs hypothesis are obviously not genuine as their missing door handles and number plates indicate junkyard cars.
They pushed out propaganda for controlled demolition, DEWs, thermite/nanothermite and nukes - all methods have been propagandised to us. I believe there is a correct one, controlled demolition, but my hypothesis is not based on the evidence shown to us ... because ALL of it is fake.
Everything they showed us of 9/11 is FAKE - there may be genuine evidence included but essentially it is fake.
--- The witness, loved one, emergency responder and reporter testimonies are scripted - we can see, for example, that Brian Williams' question to David Restuccio, "Can you confirm it was No 7 that just went in?" is scripted because "to go in" is an industry term used because buildings fall in on themselves and Williams would never have used that term naturally because a. he would not be familiar with it, b. he would instinctively know not to incriminate the authorities in such a way. The reporters alluding to controlled demolition are all scripted and targeted to the anticipated disbelievers of the nonsense story - they didn't want journalists propagandising fire because then it would reveal they were in on it and they didn't want people to recognise that a significant number of media personnel were in on it - it wouldn't fit their "people left to die cold-bloodedly in the buildings" narrative pushed to the disbelievers when the death and injury were staged.
--- The plane crashes are fake
--- The images of the injured are of people participating in drills
--- The jumpers are CGI
--- The footage of the building destructions is fake (even though WTC-7's destruction looks far more like a controlled implosion than the twin towers' the footage of none of them is real - I think we can guess that there wouldn't have only been explosives laid at the base for WTC-7 - it was too tall a building - and in a real demolition we have to ask why the mechanical penthouse atop the building would crumple first instead of just coming down with the building as it came down)
--- The imagery of Ground Zero is fake
It's all fake
These are simple facts though:
--- No high rise steel frame building has ever been brought down by any method other than controlled demolition
--- We are told Controlled Demolition, Inc (CDI) presented their cleanup plan for the WTC eleven days after 9/11
--- CDI achieved three of their four world records in large building demolition projects in the three years before 9/11 - 1998 (2), 2000 (1).
Simon Shack of Clues Forum and others on his forum worked all this out back in 2009/2010.
It's amazing how the truth is out there ...
My hypothesis for the twin towers is that they didn't peel down as shown (not how CDs work) but were essentially tipped into the WTC which was completely evacuated. They wanted to destroy the WTC so why have buildings spitting out debris in every direction when they could aim them into a place that was targeted for destruction.
https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/911-the-movie
https://cluesforum.info/
No planes, no demolitions, no ppl falling, etc. What do imagine the tens of thousands of people watching the events unfold live that morning saw? And where are they??
I know someone who was there who said he saw a plane heading to the South Tower. No idea what he saw ... however, the two salient points are:
--- the alleged airliners didn't crash so there were no deaths in airliners
--- what they showed us on TV of planes is clearly fake
For jumpers they could have had dummies on the day but what they show us is CGI mostly (perhaps sometimes dummies).
I'm not saying there were no demolitions - of course there were - what I'm saying is that what people might have seen on the day and what they show us is different. What Clues Forum say in relation to the demolitions is that they were obscured by military obscurants - the thing is as soon as a demolition starts masses of material spews out obscuring them pretty well - see Mina Plaza - so they wouldn't be that difficult to hide - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ceXT5PYTGI
You surely don't believe anyone died in a plane though, do you?
You dont answer the question. Everything “shown to us” (read what people saw) was not faked. How could it be? People (including me) watched it live. So, if it was all fake how do you account for what people saw when they were there?
Massive amounts of what they put forward as "live" was, in fact, pre-recorded and there are obvious examples of green-screening including the infamous Mark Walsh.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxQ2-DcZuR4&t=25s
Agent131711 has a stack on it - continual reference to "pictures"
https://chemtrails.substack.com/p/911-new-discoveries-what-you-never
Fuck me. This is the laziest pile of absolute bilge I have ever read.
What are you Albert? Why do you do this?
How many people do you think won’t see through this crock of crap?
I am glad you fight the genocide in Gaza. But this schoolyard stuff is embarrassing Albert.
You were totally right about 'the 9/11 revisionist bot' I see. That did make me chuckle!
I'm glad you didn't allow yourself to get drawn in too far, Albert. This was an excellent article and a great complement to Francis'. Thank you.
He may be a person. Someone told me that and when I see pasted walls and links where there should be a few sentences I tend to think that's what it is. Its also tends to respond quickly even tho it is not following my page or subbed to it. Trying to gauge how to tell if it's a bot or not is difficult. Spend some time with an LLM like https://poe.com/Claude-3.5-Sonnet - I asked it if bots can simulate hitting links:
"Yes, bots can both hit links and leave records of doing so. Here's what they typically do:
Click simulation:
Generate fake HTTP requests
Execute JavaScript click events
Create artificial traffic logs
Manipulate analytics data
Leave browser fingerprints
Fill tracking pixel data
Create false conversion events
Simulate session data"
Yeah - that is a bit scary. Even just spending a bit of time with ChatGPT tells me even the bare minimum of what the official level of LLMs has become. The unofficial level, however, is bound to be much, much higher.
I often get very suspicious with 'ridiculously quick' responses etc. 9/11 revisionist is like that of course and it's always the same copy & paste stuff. As you say that doesn't necessarily indicate bot, but it definitely indicates continuous monitoring (keyword/phrase/article searches etc.). That could result in automated responses, for sure. It would, as it happens, be strange if the bad guys didn't have this kind of continuously running program going on. The old thing about 'if it didn't exist, it would be necessary for the bad guys to have invented it'. I do believe that the counterfactual or 'what if' approach is immensely valuable.
I've also encountered a fair few so-called 'trolls' who are like this, and often wondered if they are bots, despite their 'seeming' like real people. Which is what I mean about how far LLMs have come - it seems clear that specific 'personalities' can also be programmed.
This, obviously, also explains why I am hardly getting any translation work anymore...
There is some tapered response if you reply. You can see in this thread how that went. https://albertlucientes.substack.com/p/the-4-ds-of-disinformation/comments#comment-73503359
Many bots just leave one little comment then never engage. Ad companies do that. It may very well be a person is the crazy part. I cant really say bc ppl act differently so online,, It's easy to be misled either way. Think of how 9/11 changed so many ppl's thinking about what is possible. Disinfo exploits that
That's an interesting little exchange you had, especially from a psychological perspective. He/it doesn't actually answer questions like a human being. In fact he doesn't answer questions at all, just throws stuff back. There's a lot of projection as well, like accusing you of being a 'copy & paste' person. Hello Mr. Pot, my name's Mr. Kettle.
I also noticed a few phrases he/it had said to me too a few times, like 'horse to water but can't make it drink'.
Anyhow, I guess the real question is something like 'is the failure to engage a sign of a bot, or just a closed-minded agitator type'.
Regardless, these types do a lot of damage. Half the time I choose to just ignore them. Actually most of the time these days!
You should really read this article and get your head unstuck from your arse - You've been duped by the neuro-linguistic selling techniques of Richard Gage and his architects for an engineered truth's COINTELPRO organisation.
Link: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
I already read it. It didn't do anything for me. Sorry.
9/11 is a fantastic man who I know. He unlike you and Albert, care for a little thing called reality - in the separation of DATA and MODEL.
Do you people never ever ever ever ever ever ever consider looking at the evidence instead of parroting fairy tales and pseudoscience ?
There is NOTHING scary about examining the evidence with scepticism Evelyn.
Changing your position based on reality is not a sin.
So you're in on it too, then. Duly noted.
See my above comment about the fact that if you were genuine you would express love and care and rage against the people who carry out these false flags and psyops. But you people never do.
You seriously, seriously need to tell your supervisor about that and rethink the way you post your fucking misdirectional bullshit.
Psychology blows the lot of you wide open. Fucking grow up. Amateurs.
Here is a podcast I did - You're welcome.
Link: https://rumble.com/v55uzab-the-pirate-truth-podcast-with-911-revisionist.html
Hybrid operation then, is it?
I'd rather not waste my precious time listening to podcasts like this, though. Although I am intrigued about how rude or otherwise you were on it.
The premeditated ignorance strikes again....
Tell me how you feel about the people who carry out all these psyops. You never do. That's telling. You only attack other people who want to know the truth. Like, if they don't agree with you, you attack them.
A genuine 'truth seeker' would have a totally different psychological profile. So I seriously advise you, as a counter-subversion agent, to have an urgent meeting with your supervisor to redress this glaring psychological anomaly in your cognitive infiltration.
I'm fucking serious here, by the way. You and I know that your so called 'science' is ludicrous. You may succeed in 'recruiting' idiots, but more intelligent people like me, and Albert, and Francis, are totally beyond your capabilities. Which, naturally, explains why you expend so much energy on attacking us.
By now, you can't just shut us down because that's also a dead giveaway. So you need to think about a new strategy.
Maybe go back to your original objective and reassess the situation. Are you a fully-paid up member of the monstrous cabal who absolutely hates humanity, or are you just a corrupted human? Bribed or blackmailed, that is. Or given the proverbial 'offer you can't refuse' (which would mean you used to blog under a different name, of course).
Either way, you, and your supervisor, seriously need to have an urgent meeting to reconsider your strategy. Because the truth is, the more you go on, the more utterly ridiculous you look. Same goes for your 'theories'. You are, indeed, going to have to have this meeting at some point soon. It may have worked for a while, but it's run its course.
If you want my help and advice (given how much more intelligent I am than you lot) then I would be happy to provide it. I mean that offer sincerely, by the way. Obviously you have to save face so you won't answer in a comment here. But seriously, fucking talk to your supervisor. Because more intelligent people like me are just going to keep on provoking you into looking more, and more, rude, insulting, unattractive, and frankly stupid.
Don't say I didn't warn you or offer you, eh?
My dear you are projecting your short comings...
People don't like it gets pointed out that they've been fooled.
9/11 was an attack on human consciousness, a trauma based mind control event and most people like you that might even be financially invested in architects for an engineered truth, Steven E. Jones, Richard Gage and more's lies, due to their neuro-linguistic selling techniques have allowed their PTSD of 9/11 cloud their judgement.
Repeat a lie, repeat it often enough and later it will become truth...
Why do you think Gage does between 60 and 90 presentations a year?
Your unwillingness to even consider the information shared with you is proof that you are playing a premeditated ignorance game... It's really a sad state of affairs. But stay in your comfort zone. I know how difficult it is for people to really challenge long held beliefs...
Just goes to show, once again, you can bring a horse to water and cannot force it to drink.
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
What really gives you people away is your total lack of normal human emotional response. There's a term for that, it's called 'sociopath'.
The same is true for all the cognitive infiltrators. It's easy to recruit them precisely because they don't care. Give them a fair amount of money and boost the algorithm to give them dozens of likes and follows and so on and their narcissistic ego is satisfied.
You see, ultimately it doesn't matter a jot how 9-11 was carried out, whether there were or weren't any planes or whether the twins were brought down by controlled demolition or DEWs. What it led to was a war of terror impacting trauma on well over a billion people. That's hundreds of millions of children being subjected to continuous abuse, like the children of Gaza are suffering right now.
But you don't care. By contrast, if you read people like myself, or Albert, or Francis, or any other genuine person you will easily detect a normal and understandable emotional reaction, a mixture of anger and distress mainly. That's how you can tell they - we - are not subversive cognitive infiltrators.
This is the reason why I say you need to have a word with your supervisor (I notice you pointedly avoided addressing those points I made). Of course if you were to suddenly express anger and distress and suchlike that would be obvious, so you should do it gradually.
Your response, however, is typical of one with a weak internal ego/self-esteem/self-perception - when you are challenged you respond with aggression, rudeness and insults. That's a sign of a weakness in your position, of which you are perfectly self-aware. It hurts your narcissistic ego to be challenged.
And your ego is clearly more important to you than the implications of hundreds of millions of innocent people being abused and terrorised. This tells me, blatantly, everything I need to know about you.
As for my own parting shot, I will tell you something which will cut right through to the core of you, your fragile ego. It's your repetitive reflex response to do your copy & paste thing. Because the other possibly even more important thing about you is that, fundamentally, you are just BORING!
O, dear truly intellectually disingenuous article, just like Francis' ....
I'm not going delve into your full article and break it down bit by bit, because I see it as a waste of time, as I have danced with disingenuous people like you way too often and my articles cover people like you in depth, BUT I will suggest people look at the "truth suppressie timeline" article I wrote as it lays out exactly what happened right after the "9/11 scholars for truth" was formed in 2005 and how Dr Wood, Prof James Fetzer, Dr Steven E. Jones were "comparing notes" and what fallout there was....
Maybe you too need to go read it? It also covers Greg Jenkins...
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
Dr Greg Jenkins’ “Directed Debunking Energy” and Dr Judy Wood
Scholarly Questions and Inquiry, or Badgering, Misrepresentation and Harassment?
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/dr-greg-jenkins-directed-debunking
Then pertaining to the "thermite hoax" - More suggested reading;
You can download the Refutation of Richard Gage’s Game in 2008 AND 2023: https://truthsummit.info/media-files/DrJudyWood-refutation-RichardGage-claims.pdf
The molecular dissociation of the thermite & nuke theories
People are so easily led by perceived "experts".
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-controlled-demolition-of-thermite
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to....
A black-ops cold DEW technology, that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)
Refutation of the 9/11 "truther" narratives
A special presentation refuting 10 thermite points of contention against DEW on 9/11
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/refutation-of-the-911-truther-narratives
It's 'disingenuous' only you cannot cite even one example of it. Not very compelling. I tried to engage you in a conversation without copy and pasting walls of text but you were unable to.
We can try again right here. Start with naming one thing I wrote that is disingenuous, and just have a normal chat with no pasting pls.
My article called “The Truth Suppression Timeline” has all the proof you need of the concerted effort to stifle people looking at the evidence Dr Wood presents and the complicity of Dr Steven E. Jones, Greg Jenkins, Richard Gage, David Chandler, architects for an engineered truth, Ted Walter and his “Center for 9/11 Justice”, suppression and all the poo-ba 9/11 “truther” movement organisations…
They are ALL truth-traitors.
If you cannot get over your own cognitive dissonance, and premeditated ignorance game you’re playing with yourself, then unfortunately there is no hope for you.
Thermite believers are like pro-vaxxers that got injured by the CV-19 injections and think the constant sickness, heart issues and turbo cancers are due to climate change.
People who will be lost forever…
I too once believed the thermite bullshit, then I started thinking for myself…
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Here is a 20 minute video that most can follow: https://rumble.com/v5jnndx-understanding-the-911-evidence.html
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications