25 Comments

Fuck me. This is the laziest pile of absolute bilge I have ever read.

What are you Albert? Why do you do this?

How many people do you think won’t see through this crock of crap?

I am glad you fight the genocide in Gaza. But this schoolyard stuff is embarrassing Albert.

Expand full comment

You were totally right about 'the 9/11 revisionist bot' I see. That did make me chuckle!

I'm glad you didn't allow yourself to get drawn in too far, Albert. This was an excellent article and a great complement to Francis'. Thank you.

Expand full comment
author
Oct 30·edited Oct 30Author

He may be a person. Someone told me that and when I see pasted walls and links where there should be a few sentences I tend to think that's what it is. Its also tends to respond quickly even tho it is not following my page or subbed to it. Trying to gauge how to tell if it's a bot or not is difficult. Spend some time with an LLM like https://poe.com/Claude-3.5-Sonnet - I asked it if bots can simulate hitting links:

"Yes, bots can both hit links and leave records of doing so. Here's what they typically do:

Click simulation:

Generate fake HTTP requests

Execute JavaScript click events

Create artificial traffic logs

Manipulate analytics data

Leave browser fingerprints

Fill tracking pixel data

Create false conversion events

Simulate session data"

Expand full comment

Yeah - that is a bit scary. Even just spending a bit of time with ChatGPT tells me even the bare minimum of what the official level of LLMs has become. The unofficial level, however, is bound to be much, much higher.

I often get very suspicious with 'ridiculously quick' responses etc. 9/11 revisionist is like that of course and it's always the same copy & paste stuff. As you say that doesn't necessarily indicate bot, but it definitely indicates continuous monitoring (keyword/phrase/article searches etc.). That could result in automated responses, for sure. It would, as it happens, be strange if the bad guys didn't have this kind of continuously running program going on. The old thing about 'if it didn't exist, it would be necessary for the bad guys to have invented it'. I do believe that the counterfactual or 'what if' approach is immensely valuable.

I've also encountered a fair few so-called 'trolls' who are like this, and often wondered if they are bots, despite their 'seeming' like real people. Which is what I mean about how far LLMs have come - it seems clear that specific 'personalities' can also be programmed.

This, obviously, also explains why I am hardly getting any translation work anymore...

Expand full comment
author
Oct 30·edited Oct 30Author

There is some tapered response if you reply. You can see in this thread how that went. https://albertlucientes.substack.com/p/the-4-ds-of-disinformation/comments#comment-73503359

Many bots just leave on little comment then never engage. Ad companies do that. It may very well be a person is the crazy part. I cant really say bc ppl act differently so online,, It's easy to be misled either way. Think of how 9/11 changed so many ppl's thinking about what is possible. Disinfo exploits that

Expand full comment

That's an interesting little exchange you had, especially from a psychological perspective. He/it doesn't actually answer questions like a human being. In fact he doesn't answer questions at all, just throws stuff back. There's a lot of projection as well, like accusing you of being a 'copy & paste' person. Hello Mr. Pot, my name's Mr. Kettle.

I also noticed a few phrases he/it had said to me too a few times, like 'horse to water but can't make it drink'.

Anyhow, I guess the real question is something like 'is the failure to engage a sign of a bot, or just a closed-minded agitator type'.

Regardless, these types do a lot of damage. Half the time I choose to just ignore them. Actually most of the time these days!

Expand full comment

You should really read this article and get your head unstuck from your arse - You've been duped by the neuro-linguistic selling techniques of Richard Gage and his architects for an engineered truth's COINTELPRO organisation.

Link: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline

Expand full comment

I already read it. It didn't do anything for me. Sorry.

Expand full comment

9/11 is a fantastic man who I know. He unlike you and Albert, care for a little thing called reality - in the separation of DATA and MODEL.

Do you people never ever ever ever ever ever ever consider looking at the evidence instead of parroting fairy tales and pseudoscience ?

There is NOTHING scary about examining the evidence with scepticism Evelyn.

Changing your position based on reality is not a sin.

Expand full comment

So you're in on it too, then. Duly noted.

See my above comment about the fact that if you were genuine you would express love and care and rage against the people who carry out these false flags and psyops. But you people never do.

You seriously, seriously need to tell your supervisor about that and rethink the way you post your fucking misdirectional bullshit.

Psychology blows the lot of you wide open. Fucking grow up. Amateurs.

Expand full comment

Here is a podcast I did - You're welcome.

Link: https://rumble.com/v55uzab-the-pirate-truth-podcast-with-911-revisionist.html

Expand full comment

Hybrid operation then, is it?

I'd rather not waste my precious time listening to podcasts like this, though. Although I am intrigued about how rude or otherwise you were on it.

Expand full comment

The premeditated ignorance strikes again....

Expand full comment

Tell me how you feel about the people who carry out all these psyops. You never do. That's telling. You only attack other people who want to know the truth. Like, if they don't agree with you, you attack them.

A genuine 'truth seeker' would have a totally different psychological profile. So I seriously advise you, as a counter-subversion agent, to have an urgent meeting with your supervisor to redress this glaring psychological anomaly in your cognitive infiltration.

I'm fucking serious here, by the way. You and I know that your so called 'science' is ludicrous. You may succeed in 'recruiting' idiots, but more intelligent people like me, and Albert, and Francis, are totally beyond your capabilities. Which, naturally, explains why you expend so much energy on attacking us.

By now, you can't just shut us down because that's also a dead giveaway. So you need to think about a new strategy.

Maybe go back to your original objective and reassess the situation. Are you a fully-paid up member of the monstrous cabal who absolutely hates humanity, or are you just a corrupted human? Bribed or blackmailed, that is. Or given the proverbial 'offer you can't refuse' (which would mean you used to blog under a different name, of course).

Either way, you, and your supervisor, seriously need to have an urgent meeting to reconsider your strategy. Because the truth is, the more you go on, the more utterly ridiculous you look. Same goes for your 'theories'. You are, indeed, going to have to have this meeting at some point soon. It may have worked for a while, but it's run its course.

If you want my help and advice (given how much more intelligent I am than you lot) then I would be happy to provide it. I mean that offer sincerely, by the way. Obviously you have to save face so you won't answer in a comment here. But seriously, fucking talk to your supervisor. Because more intelligent people like me are just going to keep on provoking you into looking more, and more, rude, insulting, unattractive, and frankly stupid.

Don't say I didn't warn you or offer you, eh?

Expand full comment

O, dear truly intellectually disingenuous article, just like Francis' ....

I'm not going delve into your full article and break it down bit by bit, because I see it as a waste of time, as I have danced with disingenuous people like you way too often and my articles cover people like you in depth, BUT I will suggest people look at the "truth suppressie timeline" article I wrote as it lays out exactly what happened right after the "9/11 scholars for truth" was formed in 2005 and how Dr Wood, Prof James Fetzer, Dr Steven E. Jones were "comparing notes" and what fallout there was....

Maybe you too need to go read it? It also covers Greg Jenkins...

9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline

"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin

Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline

Dr Greg Jenkins’ “Directed Debunking Energy” and Dr Judy Wood

Scholarly Questions and Inquiry, or Badgering, Misrepresentation and Harassment?

Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/dr-greg-jenkins-directed-debunking

Then pertaining to the "thermite hoax" - More suggested reading;

You can download the Refutation of Richard Gage’s Game in 2008 AND 2023: https://truthsummit.info/media-files/DrJudyWood-refutation-RichardGage-claims.pdf

The molecular dissociation of the thermite & nuke theories

People are so easily led by perceived "experts".

Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-controlled-demolition-of-thermite

There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;

1. Problem solving skills

2. Group Think

3. They just can't handle the implications

Official narrative – Jet fuel.

Option behind door no 1 – explosives,

door no 2 – thermite,

door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.

Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to....

A black-ops cold DEW technology, that can direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter. (Direct or control – where it goes and what it does)

Refutation of the 9/11 "truther" narratives

A special presentation refuting 10 thermite points of contention against DEW on 9/11

Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/refutation-of-the-911-truther-narratives

Expand full comment
author

It's 'disingenuous' only you cannot cite even one example of it. Not very compelling. I tried to engage you in a conversation without copy and pasting walls of text but you were unable to.

We can try again right here. Start with naming one thing I wrote that is disingenuous, and just have a normal chat with no pasting pls.

Expand full comment

My article called “The Truth Suppression Timeline” has all the proof you need of the concerted effort to stifle people looking at the evidence Dr Wood presents and the complicity of Dr Steven E. Jones, Greg Jenkins, Richard Gage, David Chandler, architects for an engineered truth, Ted Walter and his “Center for 9/11 Justice”, suppression and all the poo-ba 9/11 “truther” movement organisations…

They are ALL truth-traitors.

If you cannot get over your own cognitive dissonance, and premeditated ignorance game you’re playing with yourself, then unfortunately there is no hope for you.

Thermite believers are like pro-vaxxers that got injured by the CV-19 injections and think the constant sickness, heart issues and turbo cancers are due to climate change.

People who will be lost forever…

I too once believed the thermite bullshit, then I started thinking for myself…

Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.

Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.

Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.

Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.

The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.

The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.

The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.

Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.

Here is a 20 minute video that most can follow: https://rumble.com/v5jnndx-understanding-the-911-evidence.html

There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;

1. Problem solving skills

2. Group Think

3. They just can't handle the implications

Expand full comment